GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 vs ATI Rage 128 PRO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 4 (1998−1999)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRage 4 PROG98
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 August 1999 (26 years ago)4 December 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data8
Core clock speed118 MHz567 MHz
Number of transistors8 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology250 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data25 Watt
Texture fill rate0.244.536
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0224 TFLOPS
ROPs24
TMUs28
L2 Cacheno data16 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data170 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRDDR2
Maximum RAM amount32 MB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed143 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.144 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.011.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL1.23.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 August 1999 4 December 2007
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 250 nm 65 nm

8400 GS Rev. 2 has an age advantage of 8 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 284.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Rage 128 PRO and GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Rage 128 PRO
Rage 128 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 33 votes

Rate Rage 128 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 7 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Rage 128 PRO or GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.