Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 vs ATI Rage 128 GL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 4 (1998−1999)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameRage 4Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 August 1998 (27 years ago)15 August 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data48
Core clock speed80 MHzno data
Number of transistors8 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology250 nm10 nm
Texture fill rate0.16no data
ROPs2no data
TMUs2no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 2xno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRDDR4
Maximum RAM amount32 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed60 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth960.0 MB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGAno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.0DirectX 12_1
OpenGL1.2no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 August 1998 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 250 nm 10 nm

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 has an age advantage of 22 years, and a 2400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Rage 128 GL and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Rage 128 GL is a workstation graphics card while Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Rage 128 GL
Rage 128 GL
Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 8 votes

Rate Rage 128 GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 8 votes

Rate Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Rage 128 GL or Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.