ATI FireGL V7300 vs ATI Radeon Xpress X1270

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataR500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameM690TR520
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 February 2007 (18 years ago)1 October 2005 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,599

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4no data
Core clock speedno data594 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data321 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data97 Watt
Texture fill rateno data9.504
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB512 MB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data648 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data41.47 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data9.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2007 1 October 2005
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 80 nm 90 nm

ATI Xpress X1270 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 12.5% more advanced lithography process.

ATI FireGL V7300, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Xpress X1270 and FireGL V7300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Xpress X1270 is a notebook graphics card while FireGL V7300 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon Xpress X1270
Radeon Xpress X1270
ATI FireGL V7300
FireGL V7300

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 5 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress X1270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL V7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Xpress X1270 or FireGL V7300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.