UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs vs ATI Radeon Xpress 200M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon Xpress 200M and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Graphics 750 32EUs outperforms 200M by a whopping 7720% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1540 | 744 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | R300 (2003−2008) | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) |
| GPU code name | RC410 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 2005 (20 years ago) | 30 March 2021 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 6 | 32 |
| Core clock speed | 336 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 350 MHz | 1450 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 107 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 0.67 | no data |
| ROPs | 2 | no data |
| TMUs | 2 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | no data |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | no data |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | no data |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 9.0 (9_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | no data |
| OpenCL | N/A | no data |
| Vulkan | N/A | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | -0−1 | 16 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−850%
|
18−20
+850%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−129%
|
16−18
+129%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−125%
|
50−55
+125%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 9−10
−689%
|
70−75
+689%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 7−8
−386%
|
34
+386%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−850%
|
18−20
+850%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−129%
|
16−18
+129%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−140%
|
12−14
+140%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−125%
|
50−55
+125%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 7−8
−343%
|
31
+343%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−850%
|
18−20
+850%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−129%
|
16−18
+129%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−140%
|
12−14
+140%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−7608%
|
1850−1900
+7608%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
−7400%
|
150−160
+7400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−7400%
|
75−80
+7400%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Escape from Tarkov | 1−2
−700%
|
8−9
+700%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−900%
|
10−11
+900%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−7400%
|
75−80
+7400%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−7.1%
|
14−16
+7.1%
|
| Valorant | 1−2
−1900%
|
20−22
+1900%
|
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 18
+0%
|
18
+0%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14
+0%
|
14
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 16
+0%
|
16
+0%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 13
+0%
|
13
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 13
+0%
|
13
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 6
+0%
|
6
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 15
+0%
|
15
+0%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12
+0%
|
12
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is 1900% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs performs better in 19 tests (43%)
- there's a draw in 25 tests (57%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.05 | 3.91 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 14 nm |
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs has a 7720% higher aggregate performance score, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Xpress 200M in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
