Tesla V100 DGXS 32 GB vs ATI Radeon Xpress 1250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1499not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameRS690GV100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date28 February 2007 (18 years ago)27 March 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores45120
Core clock speed400 MHz1297 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHz1530 MHz
Number of transistors120 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rate1.600489.6
Floating-point processing powerno data15.67 TFLOPS
ROPs4128
TMUs4320
Tensor Coresno data640
L1 Cacheno data10 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared876 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data897.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-7.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 February 2007 27 March 2018
Chip lithography 80 nm 12 nm

Tesla V100 DGXS 32 GB has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Xpress 1250 and Tesla V100 DGXS 32 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Xpress 1250 is a notebook graphics card while Tesla V100 DGXS 32 GB is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon Xpress 1250
Radeon Xpress 1250
NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 32 GB
Tesla V100 DGXS 32 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 20 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress 1250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 8 votes

Rate Tesla V100 DGXS 32 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Xpress 1250 or Tesla V100 DGXS 32 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.