Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano vs ATI Xpress 1250

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1510not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameRS690Vega 10
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date28 February 2007 (18 years ago)1 October 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores44096
Core clock speed400 MHz1156 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHz1247 MHz
Number of transistors120 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rate1.600319.2
ROPs464
TMUs4256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data152 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared2048 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data409.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12.0
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 February 2007 1 October 2017
Chip lithography 80 nm 14 nm

RX Vega 64 Nano has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Xpress 1250 and Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Xpress 1250 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon Xpress 1250
Radeon Xpress 1250
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 20 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress 1250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 5 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Xpress 1250 or Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.