ATI Radeon HD 2400 vs ATI Xpress 1250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Xpress 1250 with Radeon HD 2400, including specs and performance data.

ATI Xpress 1250
2007
0.10

HD 2400 outperforms Xpress 1250 by a whopping 190% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking15171402
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.12
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameRS690RV610
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date28 February 2007 (19 years ago)19 February 2008 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores440
Core clock speed400 MHz398 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHzno data
Number of transistors120 million180 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data20 Watt
Texture fill rate1.6001.592
Floating-point processing powerno data0.03184 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs44
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared495 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data7.92 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL2.03.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI Xpress 1250 0.10
ATI HD 2400 0.29
+190%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI Xpress 1250 42
Samples: 75
ATI HD 2400 120
+186%
Samples: 91

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Valorant 24−27
−171%
65−70
+171%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Valorant 24−27
−171%
65−70
+171%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Valorant 24−27
−171%
65−70
+171%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Valorant 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.10 0.29
Recency 28 February 2007 19 February 2008
Chip lithography 80 nm 65 nm

ATI HD 2400 has a 190% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, and a 23% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 2400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Xpress 1250 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Xpress 1250 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 2400 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 20 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress 1250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 54 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Xpress 1250 or Radeon HD 2400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.