Radeon RX 5300 vs ATI Xpress 1200 IGP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated338
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data14.01
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameRS600Navi 14
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date28 February 2007 (19 years ago)28 May 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1408
Core clock speed501 MHz1327 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1645 MHz
Number of transistors120 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data100 Watt
Texture fill rate2.004144.8
Floating-point processing powerno data4.632 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs488
L2 Cacheno data1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data180 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared3 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared96 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data168.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 February 2007 28 May 2020
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm

RX 5300 has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 1186% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Xpress 1200 IGP and Radeon RX 5300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Xpress 1200 IGP is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 5300 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress 1200 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 47 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Xpress 1200 IGP or Radeon RX 5300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.