ATI Rage 128 VR AGP vs ATI Radeon Xpress 1150

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1464not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)Rage 4 (1998−1999)
GPU code nameRS485Rage 4
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 May 2006 (18 years ago)1 August 1998 (26 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6no data
Core clock speed400 MHz80 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data8 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm250 nm
Texture fill rate0.80.16
ROPs22
TMUs22

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 2x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared125 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.06.0
OpenGL2.01.2
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2006 1 August 1998
Chip lithography 110 nm 250 nm

ATI Xpress 1150 has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 127.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Xpress 1150 and Rage 128 VR AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Xpress 1150 is a notebook card while Rage 128 VR AGP is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon Xpress 1150
Radeon Xpress 1150
ATI Rage 128 VR AGP
Rage 128 VR AGP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 60 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress 1150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Rage 128 VR AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.