GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs ATI Radeon Xpress 1150

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1513not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameRS485GT218
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 May 2006 (19 years ago)13 June 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores616
Core clock speed400 MHz589 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data260 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate0.84.712
Floating-point processing powerno data0.04486 TFLOPS
ROPs24
TMUs28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data9.6 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.011.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGL2.03.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2006 13 June 2012
Chip lithography 110 nm 40 nm

9400 GT Rev. 3 has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 175% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Xpress 1150 and GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Xpress 1150 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon Xpress 1150
Radeon Xpress 1150
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 60 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress 1150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 133 votes

Rate GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Xpress 1150 or GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.