ATI Radeon X1300 PRO AGP vs ATI Xpress 1100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1509not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameRC410RV515
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date17 October 2007 (17 years ago)1 October 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6no data
Core clock speed300 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed300 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data107 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data31 Watt
Texture fill rate0.62.400
ROPs24
TMUs24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 8x
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data12.8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGL2.02.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 October 2007 1 October 2005
Chip lithography 130 nm 90 nm

ATI Xpress 1100 has an age advantage of 2 years.

ATI X1300 PRO AGP, on the other hand, has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Xpress 1100 and Radeon X1300 PRO AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon Xpress 1100
Radeon Xpress 1100
ATI Radeon X1300 PRO AGP
Radeon X1300 PRO AGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 29 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress 1100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Radeon X1300 PRO AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Xpress 1100 or Radeon X1300 PRO AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.