Radeon Pro V520 vs ATI Xpress 1100 Mobile IGP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated217
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data10.03
ArchitectureR300 (2003−2008)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameRS482Navi 12
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date2005 (21 years ago)1 December 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2304
Core clock speed300 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1600 MHz
Manufacturing process technology110 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data225 Watt
Texture fill rate0.6230.4
Floating-point processing powerno data7.373 TFLOPS
ROPs264
TMUs2144
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared2048 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 110 nm 7 nm

Pro V520 has a 1471% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Xpress 1100 Mobile IGP and Radeon Pro V520. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Xpress 1100 Mobile IGP is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro V520 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 8 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress 1100 Mobile IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 15 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Xpress 1100 Mobile IGP or Radeon Pro V520, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.