ATI Radeon HD 4200 vs ATI Xpress 1100 Mobile IGP

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1408
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR300 (2003−2008)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameRS482RS880
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2005 (20 years ago)1 August 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data40
Core clock speed300 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistorsno data181 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm55 nm
Texture fill rate0.62.000
Floating-point processing powerno data0.04 TFLOPS
ROPs24
TMUs24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.010.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGL2.03.3
OpenCLN/A1.0
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 110 nm 55 nm

ATI HD 4200 has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Xpress 1100 Mobile IGP and Radeon HD 4200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Xpress 1100 Mobile IGP is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 4200 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon Xpress 1100 Mobile IGP
Radeon Xpress 1100 Mobile IGP
ATI Radeon HD 4200
Radeon HD 4200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 5 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress 1100 Mobile IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 305 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Xpress 1100 Mobile IGP or Radeon HD 4200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.