ATI Radeon 9600 PRO vs ATI Xpress 1100 Mobile IGP

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1511
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.43
ArchitectureR300 (2003−2008)R300 (2003−2008)
GPU code nameRS482RV350
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2005 (20 years ago)1 October 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed300 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistorsno data60 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data18 Watt
Texture fill rate0.61.600
ROPs24
TMUs24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared300 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data9.6 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.09.0 (9_0)
OpenGL2.02.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 110 nm 130 nm

ATI Xpress 1100 Mobile IGP has a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Xpress 1100 Mobile IGP and Radeon 9600 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Xpress 1100 Mobile IGP is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9600 PRO is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon Xpress 1100 Mobile IGP
Radeon Xpress 1100 Mobile IGP
ATI Radeon 9600 PRO
Radeon 9600 PRO

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 5 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress 1100 Mobile IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 78 votes

Rate Radeon 9600 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Xpress 1100 Mobile IGP or Radeon 9600 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.