Radeon Instinct MI250X vs ATI X800

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1417not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.50no data
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)CDNA 2.0 (2021)
GPU code nameR430Aldebaran
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 October 2004 (20 years ago)8 November 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data14080
Core clock speed400 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1700 MHz
Number of transistors160 million58,200 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate4.8001,496
Floating-point processing powerno data47.87 TFLOPS
ROPs12no data
TMUs12880

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRHBM2e
Maximum RAM amount256 MB128 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed350 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s3,277 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)N/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGL2.0N/A
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2004 8 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 128 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 500 Watt

ATI X800 has 1566.7% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI250X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 17 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1733.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X800 and Radeon Instinct MI250X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X800 is a desktop card while Radeon Instinct MI250X is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X800
Radeon X800
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X
Radeon Instinct MI250X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 38 votes

Rate Radeon X800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 127 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI250X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X800 or Radeon Instinct MI250X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.