Radeon HD 8950M vs ATI X800 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1439not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.33no data
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameR423Saturn
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 December 2004 (21 years ago)14 May 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speed500 MHz1075 MHz
Number of transistors160 million2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate8.00051.60
Floating-point processing powerno data1.651 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs1648
L1 Cacheno data192 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s88 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2004 14 May 2013
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 100 Watt

ATI X800 XT has 85.2% lower power consumption.

HD 8950M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X800 XT and Radeon HD 8950M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X800 XT is a desktop graphics card while Radeon HD 8950M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 16 votes

Rate Radeon X800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 24 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8950M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X800 XT or Radeon HD 8950M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.