Radeon 630 vs ATI X800 XT Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated759
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data5.90
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameR423Polaris 23
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 December 2004 (21 years ago)13 May 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data512
Core clock speed475 MHz1082 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1218 MHz
Number of transistors160 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate7.60038.98
Floating-point processing powerno data1.247 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs1632
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP Pro 8xPCIe 3.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2004 13 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 50 Watt

Radeon 630 has an age advantage of 14 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 829% more advanced lithography process, and 8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition and Radeon 630. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition is a desktop graphics card while Radeon 630 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 35 votes

Rate Radeon 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition or Radeon 630, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.