GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs ATI Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameR423GT200B
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 December 2004 (21 years ago)16 February 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data240
Core clock speed475 MHz633 MHz
Number of transistors160 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt219 Watt
Texture fill rate7.60050.64
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs1628
TMUs1680
L2 Cacheno data224 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP Pro 8xPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB896 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit448 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1134 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s127.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI2x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL2.03.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2004 16 February 2010
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 896 MB
Chip lithography 130 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 219 Watt

ATI X800 XT Mac Edition has 305.6% lower power consumption.

GTX 275 PhysX Edition, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 250% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 136.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition and GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition
Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition or GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.