Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics vs ATI X800 XL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1480not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.25no data
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameR430Spectre Lite
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 December 2004 (21 years ago)17 February 2014 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed400 MHz554 MHz
Boost clock speedno data800 MHz
Number of transistors160 million2,410 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate6.40013.30
Floating-point processing powerno data0.4255 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs1624

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16IGP
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed490 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth31.36 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.0
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2004 17 February 2014
Chip lithography 110 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 90 Watt

ATI X800 XL has 84% lower power consumption.

R7 Mobile Graphics, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 293% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X800 XL and Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X800 XL is a desktop graphics card while Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 15 votes

Rate Radeon X800 XL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 6 votes

Rate Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X800 XL or Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.