Radeon 630 vs ATI X800 SE AGP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated759
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data5.90
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameR420Polaris 23
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 September 2004 (21 years ago)13 May 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data512
Core clock speed450 MHz1082 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1218 MHz
Number of transistors160 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate3.60038.98
Floating-point processing powerno data1.247 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs832
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x MolexNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2004 13 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 14 nm

Radeon 630 has an age advantage of 14 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X800 SE AGP and Radeon 630. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X800 SE AGP is a desktop graphics card while Radeon 630 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X800 SE AGP
Radeon X800 SE AGP
AMD Radeon 630
Radeon 630

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon X800 SE AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 34 votes

Rate Radeon 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X800 SE AGP or Radeon 630, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.