PG506-232 vs ATI Radeon X800 SE AGP

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameR420GA100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 September 2004 (20 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3584
Core clock speed450 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1440 MHz
Number of transistors160 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data165 Watt
Texture fill rate3.600322.6
Floating-point processing powerno data10.32 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs8224
Tensor Coresno data224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x Molex8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRHBM2
Maximum RAM amount256 MB24 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit3072 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1215 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s933.1 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)N/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGL2.1N/A
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2004 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 24 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 7 nm

PG506-232 has an age advantage of 16 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1757.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X800 SE AGP and PG506-232. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X800 SE AGP is a desktop graphics card while PG506-232 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X800 SE AGP
Radeon X800 SE AGP
NVIDIA PG506-232
PG506-232

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon X800 SE AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate PG506-232 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X800 SE AGP or PG506-232, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.