Radeon RX Vega 2 vs ATI X800 PRO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1489not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.24no data
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameR423Vega Raven Ridge
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 May 2004 (22 years ago)7 January 2018 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data128
Core clock speed475 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Number of transistors160 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology130 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)48 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate5.700no data
ROPs12no data
TMUs12no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x Molexno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount256 MBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed450 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Videono data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12_1
OpenGL2.0no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2004 7 January 2018
Chip lithography 130 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 48 Watt 15 Watt

RX Vega 2 has an age advantage of 13 years, a 983% more advanced lithography process, and 220% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X800 PRO and Radeon RX Vega 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X800 PRO is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 2 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon X800 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 261 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X800 PRO or Radeon RX Vega 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.