ATI FireMV 2200 PCI vs ATI Radeon X800 PRO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1472not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.23no data
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameR423RV280
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 May 2004 (21 years ago)2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed475 MHz240 MHz
Number of transistors160 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)48 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate5.7000.96
ROPs124
TMUs124

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCI
Lengthno data170 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x MolexNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed450 MHz400 MBps
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s3.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DMS-59

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)8.1
OpenGL2.01.4
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 130 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 48 Watt 15 Watt

ATI X800 PRO has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 15.4% more advanced lithography process.

ATI FireMV 2200 PCI, on the other hand, has 220% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X800 PRO and FireMV 2200 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X800 PRO
Radeon X800 PRO
ATI FireMV 2200 PCI
FireMV 2200 PCI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2 votes

Rate Radeon X800 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireMV 2200 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X800 PRO or FireMV 2200 PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.