Radeon Vega 9 Mobile vs ATI X800 PRO AGP

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameR420Picasso
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 May 2004 (21 years ago)6 January 2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data576
Core clock speed475 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors160 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)48 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate5.70046.80
Floating-point processing powerno data1.498 TFLOPS
ROPs128
TMUs1236

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xIGP
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x Molexno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed450 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2004 6 January 2019
Chip lithography 130 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 48 Watt 15 Watt

Vega 9 Mobile has an age advantage of 14 years, a 829% more advanced lithography process, and 220% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X800 PRO AGP and Radeon Vega 9 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X800 PRO AGP is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Vega 9 Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Radeon X800 PRO AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 5 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 9 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X800 PRO AGP or Radeon Vega 9 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.