Iris Plus Graphics 940 vs ATI Radeon X800 GTO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1409not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.42no data
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameR423Ice Lake GT2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date29 December 2007 (18 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed400 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistors160 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology130 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate4.80024.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.768 TFLOPS
ROPs128
TMUs1224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed350 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12 (12_1)
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 130 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics 940 has a 1200% more advanced lithography process, and 226.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X800 GTO and Iris Plus Graphics 940. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X800 GTO
Radeon X800 GTO
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940
Iris Plus Graphics 940

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 38 votes

Rate Radeon X800 GTO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 83 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 940 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X800 GTO or Iris Plus Graphics 940, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.