GeForce 9800S vs ATI Radeon X800 GTO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1401not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.42no data
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameR423G94
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date29 December 2007 (17 years ago)15 July 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data64
Core clock speed400 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors160 million505 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate4.80019.20
Floating-point processing powerno data0.192 TFLOPS
ROPs1216
TMUs1232
L2 Cacheno data64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed350 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s51.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoVGAHDMISingle Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF + HDA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL2.02.1
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 December 2007 15 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 75 Watt

ATI X800 GTO has 53.1% lower power consumption.

GeForce 9800S, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X800 GTO and GeForce 9800S. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X800 GTO is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 9800S is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X800 GTO
Radeon X800 GTO
NVIDIA GeForce 9800S
GeForce 9800S

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 37 votes

Rate Radeon X800 GTO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 votes

Rate GeForce 9800S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X800 GTO or GeForce 9800S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.