Arc Pro A50 vs ATI Radeon X800 GTO

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1333not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.42no data
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameR423DG2-128
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date29 December 2007 (16 years ago)8 August 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1024
Core clock speed400 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2350 MHz
Number of transistors160 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate4.800150.4
Floating-point processing powerno data4.813 TFLOPS
ROPs1232
TMUs1264
Ray Tracing Coresno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed350 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s192.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 December 2007 8 August 2022
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 75 Watt

ATI X800 GTO has 53.1% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro A50, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2066.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X800 GTO and Arc Pro A50. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X800 GTO is a desktop card while Arc Pro A50 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X800 GTO
Radeon X800 GTO
Intel Arc Pro A50
Arc Pro A50

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 33 votes

Rate Radeon X800 GTO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Arc Pro A50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.