Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU vs ATI Radeon X800 GTO

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1401not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.42no data
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)no data
GPU code nameR423no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date29 December 2007 (17 years ago)31 October 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data14
Core clock speed400 MHzno data
Number of transistors160 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology130 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.800no data
ROPs12no data
TMUs12no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRLPDDR5-6400
Maximum RAM amount128 MBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed350 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Videono data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)no data
OpenGL2.0no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 December 2007 31 October 2023
Chip lithography 130 nm 5 nm

Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU has an age advantage of 15 years, and a 2500% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X800 GTO and M3 Pro 14-Core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X800 GTO is a desktop graphics card while Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X800 GTO
Radeon X800 GTO
Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU
M3 Pro 14-Core GPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 37 votes

Rate Radeon X800 GTO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 37 votes

Rate M3 Pro 14-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X800 GTO or M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.