Radeon RX 6300 XT vs ATI X800 GT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1456not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.39no data
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameR480Navi 24
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 November 2005 (20 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1024
Core clock speed475 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2500 MHz
Number of transistors160 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology130 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate5.700160.0
Floating-point processing powerno data5.12 TFLOPS
ROPs1232
TMUs1264

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed493 MHz16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth31.55 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 100 Watt

ATI X800 GT has 150% lower power consumption.

RX 6300 XT, on the other hand, has a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1757% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X800 GT and Radeon RX 6300 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 11 votes

Rate Radeon X800 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 25 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6300 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X800 GT or Radeon RX 6300 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.