Radeon RX 590 GME vs ATI X700 PRO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1460not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.42no data
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameRV410Polaris 20
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 September 2004 (21 years ago)9 March 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$179 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2304
Core clock speed425 MHz1257 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1420 MHz
Number of transistors120 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate3.400204.5
Floating-point processing powerno data6.543 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs8144
L1 Cacheno data576 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount128 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed430 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth13.76 GB/s256.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2004 9 March 2020
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 175 Watt

ATI X700 PRO has 430.3% lower power consumption.

RX 590 GME, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X700 PRO and Radeon RX 590 GME. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X700 PRO
Radeon X700 PRO
AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
Radeon RX 590 GME

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 8 votes

Rate Radeon X700 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 857 votes

Rate Radeon RX 590 GME on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X700 PRO or Radeon RX 590 GME, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.