Radeon Instinct MI355X vs ATI X700 PRO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1460not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.42no data
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)CDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameRV410CDNA Next
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 September 2004 (21 years ago)2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$179 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16384
Core clock speed425 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2400 MHz
Number of transistors120 million185,000 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt1400 Watt
Texture fill rate3.4002,457.6
Floating-point processing powerno data78.64 TFLOPS
ROPs8no data
TMUs81024
Tensor Coresno data1024
L1 Cacheno data4 MB
L2 Cacheno data16 MB
L3 Cacheno data256 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Width1-slotOAM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM3e
Maximum RAM amount128 MB288 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed430 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth13.76 GB/s8.19 TB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)N/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGL2.0N/A
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 288 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 1400 Watt

ATI X700 PRO has 4142.4% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI355X, on the other hand, has a 230300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 3566.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X700 PRO and Radeon Instinct MI355X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X700 PRO is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Instinct MI355X is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X700 PRO
Radeon X700 PRO
AMD Radeon Instinct MI355X
Radeon Instinct MI355X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 8 votes

Rate Radeon X700 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Instinct MI355X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X700 PRO or Radeon Instinct MI355X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.