CMP 50HX vs ATI Radeon X700 PRO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1470not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.42no data
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRV410TU102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 September 2004 (21 years ago)24 June 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$179 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3584
Core clock speed425 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1545 MHz
Number of transistors120 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate3.400296.6
Floating-point processing powerno data11.07 TFLOPS
ROPs880
TMUs8192
Tensor Coresno data448
Ray Tracing Coresno data56
L1 Cacheno data3.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data5 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x4
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB10 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed430 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth13.76 GB/s560.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2004 24 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 10 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 250 Watt

ATI X700 PRO has 658% lower power consumption.

CMP 50HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 16 years, a 7900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 817% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X700 PRO and CMP 50HX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X700 PRO is a desktop graphics card while CMP 50HX is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 8 votes

Rate Radeon X700 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 80 votes

Rate CMP 50HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X700 PRO or CMP 50HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.