GeForce 210 PCI vs ATI Radeon X600 SE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1501not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.25no data
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameRV370GT216
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 September 2004 (21 years ago)12 October 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16
Core clock speed325 MHz475 MHz
Number of transistors107 million486 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)36 Watt31 Watt
Texture fill rate1.3003.800
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0352 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs48
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCI
Lengthno data145 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR2
Maximum RAM amount128 MB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth4 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.011.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGL2.03.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2004 12 October 2009
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 110 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 36 Watt 31 Watt

210 PCI has an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 175% more advanced lithography process, and 16.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X600 SE and GeForce 210 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X600 SE
Radeon X600 SE
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI
GeForce 210 PCI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 6 votes

Rate Radeon X600 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 85 votes

Rate GeForce 210 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X600 SE or GeForce 210 PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.