UHD Graphics G4 48EU Mobile vs ATI Radeon X600 PRO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1407not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.32no data
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameRV380Lakefield GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 September 2004 (20 years ago)28 May 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed400 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data500 MHz
Number of transistors75 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology130 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)36 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate1.60016.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16Ring Bus
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed300 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2004 28 May 2020
Chip lithography 130 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 36 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics G4 48EU Mobile has an age advantage of 15 years, a 1200% more advanced lithography process, and 140% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X600 PRO and UHD Graphics G4 48EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X600 PRO is a desktop card while UHD Graphics G4 48EU Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X600 PRO
Radeon X600 PRO
Intel UHD Graphics G4 48EU Mobile
UHD Graphics G4 48EU Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 11 votes

Rate Radeon X600 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate UHD Graphics G4 48EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.