HD Graphics P4600 vs ATI Radeon X300

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated959
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.29
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)Generation 7.5 (2013)
GPU code nameRV370Haswell GT2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 September 2004 (20 years ago)1 June 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data160
Core clock speed375 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistors107 million392 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)36 Watt84 Watt
Texture fill rate1.50024.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs42
TMUs420

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16IGP
Width1-slotIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount64 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed200 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.012 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL2.04.3
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.80

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2004 1 June 2013
Chip lithography 110 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 36 Watt 84 Watt

ATI X300 has 133.3% lower power consumption.

HD Graphics P4600, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X300 and HD Graphics P4600. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X300
Radeon X300
Intel HD Graphics P4600
HD Graphics P4600

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 30 votes

Rate Radeon X300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 34 votes

Rate HD Graphics P4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.