Matrox Parhelia 128 MB vs ATI Radeon X300 SE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)Parhelia (2002−2006)
GPU code nameRV370Parhelia-512
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 September 2004 (21 years ago)25 June 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed325 MHz200 MHz
Number of transistors107 million80 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Wattno data
Texture fill rate1.3000.8
ROPs44
TMUs44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 4x
Lengthno data175 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount64 MB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth3.2 GB/s16 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.08.1
OpenGL2.01.5
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2004 25 June 2002
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 110 nm 150 nm

ATI X300 SE has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 36.4% more advanced lithography process.

Matrox Parhelia 128 MB, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X300 SE and Matrox Parhelia 128 MB. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X300 SE
Radeon X300 SE
Matrox Parhelia 128 MB
Parhelia 128 MB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 29 votes

Rate Radeon X300 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 4 votes

Rate Matrox Parhelia 128 MB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X300 SE or Matrox Parhelia 128 MB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.