Arc Pro A60 vs ATI Radeon X300 SE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated275
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data13.40
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameRV370DG2-256
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 September 2004 (21 years ago)6 June 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2048
Core clock speed325 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2050 MHz
Number of transistors107 million11,500 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate1.300262.4
Floating-point processing powerno data8.397 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs4128
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L2 Cacheno data12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth3.2 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 2.0

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2004 6 June 2023
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 130 Watt

ATI X300 SE has 333.3% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro A60, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 18 years, a 19100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1733.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X300 SE and Arc Pro A60. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X300 SE is a desktop graphics card while Arc Pro A60 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X300 SE
Radeon X300 SE
Intel Arc Pro A60
Arc Pro A60

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 29 votes

Rate Radeon X300 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 25 votes

Rate Arc Pro A60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X300 SE or Arc Pro A60, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.