GeForce Go 7900 SE vs ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameRV370G73
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date25 October 2006 (19 years ago)18 April 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed325 MHz350 MHz
Number of transistors107 million177 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate1.3004.200
ROPs48
TMUs412

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed300 MHz333 MHz
Memory bandwidth4.8 GB/s21.31 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.09.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGL2.02.1
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 October 2006 18 April 2006
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 110 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 20 Watt

ATI X300 SE HyperMemory has an age advantage of 6 months.

Go 7900 SE, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 22% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory and GeForce Go 7900 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory is a desktop graphics card while GeForce Go 7900 SE is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 4 votes

Rate Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce Go 7900 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory or GeForce Go 7900 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.