Radeon Vega 3 Efficient vs ATI X1950 PRO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1405not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.32no data
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameRV570Raven
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 October 2006 (19 years ago)26 May 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data192
Core clock speed575 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistors330 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)66 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate6.90012.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs124
TMUs1212

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16IGP
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed690 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth44.16 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.4
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2006 26 May 2018
Chip lithography 80 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 66 Watt 15 Watt

Vega 3 Efficient has an age advantage of 11 years, a 471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 340% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1950 PRO and Radeon Vega 3 Efficient. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1950 PRO
Radeon X1950 PRO
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Efficient
Radeon Vega 3 Efficient

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 148 votes

Rate Radeon X1950 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 53 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 3 Efficient on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X1950 PRO or Radeon Vega 3 Efficient, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.