HD Graphics 500 vs ATI Radeon X1900 XTX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1218
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.25
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameR580Apollo Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date24 January 2006 (19 years ago)1 September 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data96
Core clock speed650 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data650 MHz
Number of transistors384 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate10.407.800
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1248 TFLOPS
ROPs162
TMUs1612

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16Ring Bus
Length242 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed775 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth49.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.4
OpenGL2.1 (full) 3.0 (partial)4.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 January 2006 1 September 2015
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 10 Watt

HD Graphics 500 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 1250% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1900 XTX and HD Graphics 500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X1900 XTX is a desktop graphics card while HD Graphics 500 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1900 XTX
Radeon X1900 XTX
Intel HD Graphics 500
HD Graphics 500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 9 votes

Rate Radeon X1900 XTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 775 votes

Rate HD Graphics 500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X1900 XTX or HD Graphics 500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.