Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs ATI Radeon X1800 CrossFire Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated683
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data14.41
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameR520DG1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date20 December 2005 (19 years ago)31 October 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speed600 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors321 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)113 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate9.60079.20
Floating-point processing powerno data2.534 TFLOPS
ROPs1624
TMUs1648
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz2133 MHz
Memory bandwidth44.8 GB/s68.26 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.4
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 December 2005 31 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 113 Watt 25 Watt

Iris Xe MAX Graphics has an age advantage of 14 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 800% more advanced lithography process, and 352% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1800 CrossFire Edition and Iris Xe MAX Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X1800 CrossFire Edition is a desktop graphics card while Iris Xe MAX Graphics is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1800 CrossFire Edition
Radeon X1800 CrossFire Edition
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Iris Xe MAX Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate Radeon X1800 CrossFire Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 283 votes

Rate Iris Xe MAX Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X1800 CrossFire Edition or Iris Xe MAX Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.