GeForce RTX 5090 D vs ATI Radeon X1700 SE

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameRV560GB202
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date30 November 2007 (17 years ago)30 January 2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data21760
Core clock speed500 MHz2017 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2407 MHz
Number of transistors330 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt575 Watt
Texture fill rate4.0001,637
Floating-point processing powerno data104.8 TFLOPS
ROPs8176
TMUs8680
Tensor Coresno data680
Ray Tracing Coresno data170

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount512 MB32 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz2209 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s2.26 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.8
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA-10.1
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 November 2007 30 January 2025
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 32 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 575 Watt

ATI X1700 SE has 1050% lower power consumption.

RTX 5090 D, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 17 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1500% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1700 SE and GeForce RTX 5090 D. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1700 SE
Radeon X1700 SE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D
GeForce RTX 5090 D

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon X1700 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 34 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5090 D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X1700 SE or GeForce RTX 5090 D, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.