Radeon 620 vs ATI X1700 FSC

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated848
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.21
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameRV535Polaris 24
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date5 November 2007 (17 years ago)13 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed587 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1024 MHz
Number of transistors330 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)44 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate2.34824.58
Floating-point processing powerno data0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed695 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.24 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_0)
Shader Model3.06.3
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 November 2007 13 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 44 Watt 50 Watt

ATI X1700 FSC has 13.6% lower power consumption.

Radeon 620, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1700 FSC and Radeon 620. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X1700 FSC is a desktop card while Radeon 620 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1700 FSC
Radeon X1700 FSC
AMD Radeon 620
Radeon 620

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon X1700 FSC on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 65 votes

Rate Radeon 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.