Radeon R7 M265DX vs ATI X1650 XT Dual

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1102
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameRV560Topaz
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date30 October 2006 (19 years ago)12 October 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed525 MHz925 MHz
Boost clock speedno data940 MHz
Number of transistors330 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm28 nm
Texture fill rate4.200 ×222.56
Floating-point processing powerno data0.7219 TFLOPS
ROPs8 ×28
TMUs8 ×224
L1 Cacheno data96 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16IGP
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MB ×2System Shared
Memory bus width128 Bit ×2System Shared
Memory clock speed700 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVINo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_0)
Shader Model3.06.3
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 October 2006 12 October 2014
Chip lithography 80 nm 28 nm

R7 M265DX has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 186% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1650 XT Dual and Radeon R7 M265DX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X1650 XT Dual is a desktop graphics card while Radeon R7 M265DX is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon X1650 XT Dual on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 29 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M265DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X1650 XT Dual or Radeon R7 M265DX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.