GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition vs ATI Radeon X1650 PRO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1433not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.35no data
ArchitectureUltra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameRV530GK104
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 February 2007 (18 years ago)23 October 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1536
Core clock speed600 MHz719 MHz
Number of transistors157 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)44 Watt122 Watt
Texture fill rate2.40092.03
Floating-point processing powerno data2.209 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs4128
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s160.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (11_0)
Shader Model3.05.1
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2007 23 October 2012
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 44 Watt 122 Watt

ATI X1650 PRO has 177.3% lower power consumption.

GTX 680MX Mac Edition, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1650 PRO and GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X1650 PRO is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1650 PRO
Radeon X1650 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition
GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 69 votes

Rate Radeon X1650 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 9 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X1650 PRO or GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.