Arc A380M vs ATI Radeon X1650 PRO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1448not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.35no data
ArchitectureUltra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameRV530DG2-128
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 February 2007 (18 years ago)24 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1024
Core clock speed600 MHz1550 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2000 MHz
Number of transistors157 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)44 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate2.400128.0
Floating-point processing powerno data4.096 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs464
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data8
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16MXM-A (3.1)
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1937 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s186.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.6
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2007 24 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 44 Watt 35 Watt

Arc A380M has an age advantage of 15 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 1400% more advanced lithography process, and 25.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1650 PRO and Arc A380M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X1650 PRO is a desktop graphics card while Arc A380M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1650 PRO
Radeon X1650 PRO
Intel Arc A380M
Arc A380M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 69 votes

Rate Radeon X1650 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 18 votes

Rate Arc A380M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X1650 PRO or Arc A380M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.