RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon X1650 PRO AGP
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 71 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 54.24 |
| Architecture | R500 (2005−2007) | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) |
| GPU code name | RV535 | AD104 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 15 October 2006 (19 years ago) | 21 March 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 6144 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 720 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1560 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 330 million | 35,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 44 Watt | 70 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 2.400 | 299.5 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 19.17 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 4 | 64 |
| TMUs | 4 | 192 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 192 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 48 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 6 MB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 48 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | AGP 8x | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 168 mm |
| Width | 1-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x Molex | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 20 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 160 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 700 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 22.4 GB/s | 280.0 GB/s |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 9.0c (9_3) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 3.0 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| CUDA | - | 8.9 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 15 October 2006 | 21 March 2023 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 20 GB |
| Chip lithography | 80 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 44 Watt | 70 Watt |
ATI X1650 PRO AGP has 59.1% lower power consumption.
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 16 years, a 7900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1500% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon X1650 PRO AGP and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon X1650 PRO AGP is a desktop graphics card while RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
