Iris Plus Graphics G7 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1460not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameRV530Ice Lake GT2
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2 December 2007 (17 years ago)4 May 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data512
Core clock speed587 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1050 MHz
Number of transistors157 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate2.34833.60
Floating-point processing powerno data1.075 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed392 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth12.54 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.4
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.1.97

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 December 2007 4 May 2020
Chip lithography 90 nm 10 nm

Iris Plus Graphics G7 has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1650 GTO and Iris Plus Graphics G7. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X1650 GTO is a desktop graphics card while Iris Plus Graphics G7 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1650 GTO
Radeon X1650 GTO
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7
Iris Plus Graphics G7

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon X1650 GTO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 74 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X1650 GTO or Iris Plus Graphics G7, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.