Radeon Vega 7 vs ATI X1650 GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated591
Place by popularitynot in top-10013
Power efficiencyno data11.41
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRV560Cezanne
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 May 2007 (18 years ago)13 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data448
Core clock speed400 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1900 MHz
Number of transistors330 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data45 Watt
Texture fill rate3.20053.20
Floating-point processing powerno data1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs828

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16IGP
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed400 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.4
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2007 13 April 2021
Chip lithography 80 nm 7 nm

Vega 7 has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 1042.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1650 GT and Radeon Vega 7. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X1650 GT is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Vega 7 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1650 GT
Radeon X1650 GT
AMD Radeon Vega 7
Radeon Vega 7

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 4 votes

Rate Radeon X1650 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3035 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X1650 GT or Radeon Vega 7, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.