ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT vs ATI X1600 XT

Place in the ranking	1325	1322
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	0.50	0.87
Architecture	R500 (2005−2007)	TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code name	RV530	RV610
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	1 October 2007 (17 years ago)	28 June 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	no data	40
Core clock speed	590 MHz	650 MHz
Number of transistors	157 million	180 million
Manufacturing process technology	90 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	42 Watt	25 Watt
Texture fill rate	2.360	2.600
Floating-point processing power	no data	0.052 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	4
TMUs	4	4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Width	1-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	256 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	690 MHz	500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	22.08 GB/s	8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0c (9_3)	10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model	3.0	4.0
OpenGL	2.0	3.3
OpenCL	N/A	N/A
Vulkan	N/A	N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI X1600 XT 0.30

ATI HD 2400 XT 0.31
+3.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI X1600 XT 115

ATI HD 2400 XT 118
+2.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.30	0.31
Recency	1 October 2007	28 June 2007
Chip lithography	90 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	42 Watt	25 Watt

ATI X1600 XT has an age advantage of 3 months.

ATI HD 2400 XT, on the other hand, has a 3.3% higher aggregate performance score, a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 68% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon X1600 XT and Radeon HD 2400 XT.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.